Machine interpretation of the French question — to understand, never to cite

Is the assignment of a claim against a third party, provided for in Article 80, enforceable against the assigned debtor when it serves as security for a loan granted to the parent company?

Clarifying enforceability protects the bank against a debtor's refusal to acknowledge the assignment.

Produced by a model, unverified. The original question, in French, is what stands. The evidence below is in its original language.

The provision in question

Evidence (original language)

Le texte de l’article 80 mentionne l’incessibilité qui ne peut être opposée lorsque la créance est de source conventionnelle liée à l’activité du débiteur.

Whether a parent company can assign or pledge its subsidiary's receivables to secure its own loan within the OHADA space, and under what conditions such an operation is legally feasible. · OHADA.com Doctrine

← Back to the original question

Is the assignment of a claim against a third party, provided for in Article 80, enforceable against the assigned debtor when it serves as security for a loan granted to the parent company?

The provision in question

Evidence (original language)

Is the assignment of a claim against a third party, provided for in Article 80, enforceable against the assigned debtor when it serves as security for a loan granted to the parent company?