Home · Legal question · Interpretation
Machine interpretation of the French question — to understand, never to cite
In what case can the security for a third party provided for in article 4 paragraph 3 be used to guarantee the parent company's loan with the subsidiary's claims?
Determining whether the guarantee is legally valid avoids a nullity of the loan contract.
Produced by a model, unverified. The original question, in French, is what stands. The evidence below is in its original language.
The provision in question
Evidence (original language)
Le commentaire cite l’article 4 alinéa 3 comme base de la première hypothèse de cession de créances à titre de garantie.
Whether a parent company can assign or pledge its subsidiary's receivables to secure its own loan within the OHADA space, and under what conditions such an operation is legally feasible. · OHADA.com Doctrine