Machine interpretation of the French question — to understand, never to cite

What is the scope of the concept of “intermediary of commerce” with respect to its usual and professional power to act on behalf of a third party?

Determine who is subject to the liability rules described in the commentary.

Produced by a model, unverified. The original question, in French, is what stands. The evidence below is in its original language.

The provision in question

article 169 du Acte uniforme révisé portant sur le droit commercial général

Evidence (original language)

Le commentaire rappelle la définition de l’article 169 comme personne physique ou morale agissant habituellement et professionnellement pour le compte d’un tiers afin de conclure un acte juridique commercial.

What is the liability regime of commercial intermediaries (commissionnaire, courtier, agent commercial) under OHADA law when analysed against the common law of mandat — to what extent is their responsibility contractual as a principle and extracontractual only by exception? · OHADA.com Doctrine

← Back to the original question