Machine interpretation of the French question — to understand, never to cite

Is a trust-security considered a real security within the meaning of Article 4 of this Uniform Act?

Determining the legal qualification affects the validity and enforceability of the trust‑security.

Produced by a model, unverified. The original question, in French, is what stands. The evidence below is in its original language.

The provision in question

article 4 du Acte uniforme révisé portant organisation des sûretés

Evidence (original language)

L’article 4 définit les sûretés réelles comme seules valablement constituées, et le commentaire décrit la fiducie‑sûreté comme nouvelle sûreté introduite par l’Acte de 2010.

How does the fiducie-sûreté, introduced by the revised 2010 OHADA Uniform Act on Securities, protect the debtor's patrimony when the debtor company faces financial difficulties and collective proceedings? · OHADA.com Doctrine

← Back to the original question

Is a trust-security considered a real security within the meaning of Article 4 of this Uniform Act?

The provision in question

Evidence (original language)

Is a trust-security considered a real security within the meaning of Article 4 of this Uniform Act?