Machine interpretation of the French question — to understand, never to cite

How does Article 101, which defines the categories of leases concerned, apply to the forced continuation of a commercial lease during a collective proceeding?

He determines whether the lease of the tenant in difficulty indeed falls within the categories protected by article 97 of the AUPCAP.

Produced by a model, unverified. The original question, in French, is what stands. The evidence below is in its original language.

The provision in question

Evidence (original language)

Le commentaire indique que le législateur OHADA impose le maintien du bail commercial, y compris les locaux dépendants, en cas de redressement ou liquidation.

What is the fate of a commercial lease when the tenant is subject to OHADA collective proceedings for the settlement of liabilities, particularly in the context of judicial recovery and liquidation? · OHADA.com Doctrine

← Back to the original question