What Lex Cameroon records of each piece: its title, its journal, the question it addresses, and the provisions it relies on. The piece itself belongs to its author and publisher, and is not reproduced here.
Whether the conditions for opening a collective insolvency proceeding (liquidation des biens) under OHADA were met, specifically regarding the cessation of payments and the nature of the creditor's claim, as examined by the Ouagadougou Court of Appeal.
How should jurisdiction be allocated in a dispute that involves both OHADA-harmonized legal matters and non-harmonized national legal matters, particularly when a national supreme court is seized with an appeal in cassation?
What is the value and scope of a 'commandement valant saisie' (attachment order) in OHADA foreclosure law, particularly regarding the chronological priority between its publication and the filing of the 'cahier des charges' (specifications), and what are the rules governing challenges to the seizure procedure?
How does the principle of competence-competence under OHADA arbitration law apply when there is a parallel judicial proceeding and an arbitral proceeding between the same parties on the same matter, and did the CCJA correctly apply this principle in its ruling of January 31, 2011?
Après une saisie-conservatoire pratiquée sur le fondement d'un jugement exécutoire par provision, un juge national peut-il encore suspendre l'exécution provisoire ?
The article examines the use of French as a legal and judicial language in francophone black Africa, questioning its appropriateness and accessibility given the colonial legacy and the linguistic realities of the population.
Does the CCJA's rejection of new grounds mixing fact and law in cassation appeals confirm the procedural autonomy of member states and challenge the view that the CCJA acts as a third degree of jurisdiction?
The article examines the principle of institutional and procedural autonomy of OHADA member states in the application of uniform acts, questioning whether the reliance on national procedural rules undermines the uniform application and effectiveness of OHADA law, and whether harmonization of procedural rules is feasible.
Un débiteur forclos de son droit d’opposition peut-il contester devant la cour d’appel, le bien-fondé de l’ordonnance d’injonction de payer ?
How to overcome the resistance of national supreme courts to the exclusive jurisdiction of the CCJA in OHADA matters, and what reforms could improve the allocation of competences between the CCJA and national courts of cassation?