Machine interpretation of the French question — to understand, never to cite

Is the obligation to express one's request for renewal no later than three months before the expiration of the lease a matter of public policy, and can it not be derogated from by a tacit renewal clause?

Determine whether the tacit renewal clause can supersede the legal requirement for an express request, affecting the tenant's right to renewal.

Produced by a model, unverified. The original question, in French, is what stands. The evidence below is in its original language.

The provision in question

Evidence (original language)

Le commentaire indique que l’article 92 impose une demande expresse et que la clause de tacite reconduction ne peut pas l’annuler, soulignant son caractère d’ordre public.

What are the conditions for renewing a fixed-term commercial lease under OHADA law, particularly regarding the requirement for an express renewal request and the impact of a tacit renewal clause? · OHADA.com Doctrine

← Back to the original question