(1) if the court finds that there is evidence to warrant the accused to be put to his defence, it
shall put the following three options to him:
(a) that he may make a statement in his defence not on oath;
(b) that he may say nothing; or
(c) that he may give evidence on oath as a witness.
(2) The Presiding Magistrate shall inform the accused that where he opts to say nothing or to
give evidence not on oath, he shall not be asked any questions, and that where he opts to give
evidence on oath, the prosecution, the civil party and the court may ask him questions.
(3) The Presiding Magistrate shall further Worm the accused that evidence given on oath shall
have more probative value.
(4) The Presiding Magistrate shall ask the accused whether he has witnesses he wants to call
or other evidence to adduce.
Official text
Transcription: Spot-checked
In force from 27-07-2005
Source page 83
The document's transcription was spot-checked against the supplied source; this does not confirm a line-by-line review of every provision.
How Lex Cameroon marks its texts →
Section 366 of the Criminal Procedure Code/akn/cm/act/loi/2005-07-27/2005-007
Report an error in this text
AI features are in beta
Where an official English or French text exists, we show it; where none does, we give
a translation, clearly marked as one and never presented as the official text. We make
every AI feature as accurate as we can, but it can be wrong and is not legal advice —
always check the cited official text.