Également publié sous: FELIX ONANA ETOUNDI · Félix ONANA-ETOUNDI · Félix Onana Etoundi
Ce que Lex Cameroun retient de chaque texte : son titre, sa revue, la question qu'il traite, et les dispositions sur lesquelles il s'appuie. Le texte lui-même appartient à son auteur et à son éditeur, et ne figure pas ici.
What is the scope of the immunity from execution enjoyed by public legal entities under OHADA law, and how should it be interpreted in light of the CCJA's decision in the Togo Telecom case?
What mechanisms does the OHADA legislator have in place to ensure the protection of employees' rights in collective proceedings of corporate distress (judicial reorganization or liquidation)?
Quels sont, dans une entreprise en situation de redressement judiciaire ou de liquidation des biens, les mécanismes mis en place par le législateur OHADA pour assurer la protection des droits des salariés ?
Comment le contrat devrait-il se former et engendrer des obligations dans le futur droit des contrats en cours d’harmonisation dans l’espace OHADA ? Suffira-t-il d’un simple accord de volonté des parties ou faudra-t-il en plus que cette volonté s’exprime dans des formes particulières ? Par quel moyen devra-t-on prouver l’existence du contrat dans ce droit harmonisé, par un écrit, oralement ou par témoin ?
Does the OHADA uniform act on simplified recovery procedures and enforcement measures strike a balance between the interests of the creditor and the debtor in the context of bank account attachment (saisie-attribution des comptes bancaires)?
Does the OHADA uniform act on simplified recovery procedures and enforcement measures, despite its theoretical strengthening of creditor remedies, actually achieve effective enforcement in practice?
The article examines whether the future OHADA uniform act on contract law, inspired by the UNIDROIT Principles, will ensure legal security for commercial transactions in Africa while also accommodating specific African commercial practices and usages.
The piece assesses the jurisprudence of the Common Court of Justice and Arbitration (CCJA) from 1997 to 2008, examining its role in interpreting and applying OHADA law, and evaluates the statistical output, main jurisprudential trends, and difficulties faced by the Court.
Does the immunity from execution enjoyed by public legal entities under Article 30 of the OHADA Uniform Act on Simplified Recovery Procedures and Enforcement Measures apply absolutely, even when national law subjects public enterprises to private law, and should the CCJA have restricted this immunity in its ruling on the TOGO TELECOM case?
Does the OHADA Uniform Act on simplified recovery procedures and enforcement measures fundamentally overhaul the domestic law on the enforcement of court decisions in member states, specifically Cameroon, and does it establish an enforcement regime that better reassures the creditor without neglecting the debtor's rights?
What is the fate of defenses to provisional execution (défenses à l’exécution provisoire) in OHADA member states, particularly in light of Article 32 of the Uniform Act on Simplified Recovery Procedures and Enforcement Measures (AUVE) and the jurisprudence of the CCJA?
What are the practical issues arising from the suspension of individual actions in the preventive settlement procedure under OHADA law, including the scope of debts covered, the possibility of a contradictory procedure, the judge's power to verify information, and the consequences of an expert's failure to respect the deadline for filing the report?