What Lex Cameroon records of each piece: its title, its journal, the question it addresses, and the provisions it relies on. The piece itself belongs to its author and publisher, and is not reproduced here.
The article addresses the question of identifying the competent court or judge under Article 49 of the OHADA Uniform Act on Simplified Recovery Procedures and Enforcement Measures (AUPSRVE), specifically whether it refers to the traditional interim relief judge (juge des référés) or an autonomous execution judge, and what procedural urgency applies.
The article examines the legal regime of nullities under the OHADA Uniform Act on Simplified Recovery Procedures and Enforcement Measures (AUPSRVE), particularly the principle of nullity without proof of harm (grief), its exceptions, and its practical implications.