What Lex Cameroon records of each piece: its title, its journal, the question it addresses, and the provisions it relies on. The piece itself belongs to its author and publisher, and is not reproduced here.
This piece addresses the legal mechanisms for challenging or suspending provisional execution (exécution provisoire) under OHADA law, particularly in the Cameroonian context. It examines the distinction between 'défenses à l'exécution' and 'sursis à exécution', their legal regimes, procedural aspects, and the interpretative role of the CCJA.
The article examines the identity and powers of the judge competent to hear execution and seizure disputes under Article 49 of the OHADA Uniform Act, questioning whether this judge is the same as the judge of summary proceedings (juge des référés) in Cameroonian practice.