What Lex Cameroon records of each piece: its title, its journal, the question it addresses, and the provisions it relies on. The piece itself belongs to its author and publisher, and is not reproduced here.
How do African cultural and religious traditions (including Islam) relate to alternative dispute resolution (ADR) practices, and what place do amicable dispute resolution methods (mediation, conciliation, transaction) currently hold in OHADA law, with a view to better integrating them into the OHADA legal framework?
The piece addresses whether arbitration within the OHADA system is characterized by regionalism or universalism, examining the dualistic system that distinguishes between common-law arbitration under the Uniform Act and institutional arbitration under the CCJA.
Does OHADA arbitration law guarantee transparency in arbitration, and how does it address illicit practices such as corruption?
How does the OHADA uniform act on commercial sales compare with the CISG and other international sales conventions, and how do their fields of application articulate in international commercial transactions involving OHADA member states?
What is the state of implementation and effectiveness of the OHADA arbitration mechanism, particularly the 1999 Uniform Act and the CCJA Arbitration Rules, a decade after their adoption?
How does the OHADA Uniform Act organize the intervention of the judge in support (juge d'appui) in case of difficulties in constituting the arbitral tribunal in ad hoc arbitration, and what are the conditions, modalities, and remedies related to this intervention?
Can a creditor of a contractual obligation find in the OHADA legal system the means to ensure that they will obtain the promised performance from the debtor?
What are the legal effects of CCJA decisions and arbitral awards, how is exequatur organized for them within the OHADA space, and how are they received outside the OHADA space?