What Lex Cameroon records of each piece: its title, its journal, the question it addresses, and the provisions it relies on. The piece itself belongs to its author and publisher, and is not reproduced here.
What are the legal risks faced by corporate officers (mandataires sociaux) under OHADA law, and how do these risks differ between healthy companies and companies in financial difficulty?
What is the legal framework and the practical implications of the procedure under Article 59 of the OHADA Uniform Act on Commercial Companies and Economic Interest Groups (A.U.S.C.G.I.E) for the expert determination of the price of social shares?
How should the notion of 'opération de gestion' under Article 159 of the OHADA Uniform Act on Commercial Companies be defined, and should it be understood through an organic or material approach?
What is the impact of the absence of legal personality on the formation and organization of a société en participation under OHADA law?
The article examines the legal framework and conditions for minority shareholders to request a management expert (expertise de gestion) under OHADA uniform law, focusing on the quality to act, the object of the request, and the appointment of the expert.
The article addresses the issue of how the démembrement (split) of social rights (shares) between a usufructuary and a bare owner should be understood and regulated under OHADA uniform law, particularly regarding the quality of being an associate and the allocation of financial and political prerogatives.